Choosing Between a Low-Code Platform and a CMS: Pros and Cons

This is me.

Author: Tim Strawbridge

Date Created: Jan 19, 2024

  • CMS,
  • low-code,
  • WIX,
  • Wordpress,
  • Square Space,
  • Craft CMS,
  • Joomla
choosing between low-code and a cms - laptop screen

As a marketing expert, I often get asked by potential buyers about the best approach to building their online presence - should they go with a low-code platform or a traditional content management system (CMS)? Both options have their own unique advantages and disadvantages, and the choice ultimately depends on the specific needs and requirements of your business. In this article, we'll take a deep dive into the world of low-code platforms and CMSs, exploring the key factors you should consider when making your decision.

The Rise of Low-Code Platforms

Low-code platforms have been gaining significant traction in recent years, and for good reason. These platforms offer a visual, drag-and-drop interface that allows users to build applications and websites without the need for extensive coding knowledge. The primary advantage of low-code platforms is the speed and ease of development. By providing pre-built components and templates, these platforms enable non-technical users to quickly create and deploy digital solutions, often in a matter of days or weeks rather than months. This can be particularly beneficial for small and medium-sized businesses that may not have the resources or budget to hire a dedicated development team. 

Additionally, low-code platforms can help reduce costs by minimizing the need for specialized developers, and they often offer greater flexibility in terms of customization and integration with other systems. However, low-code platforms also come with their own set of drawbacks. One of the main concerns is the limited customization options, as the pre-built components and templates may not always align with the unique requirements of your business. This can be a significant issue for companies that require highly specialized or complex functionality. Another potential downside is the potential for vendor lock-in, as low-code platforms are often proprietary and may make it difficult to migrate to a different platform in the future. This can limit your long-term options and flexibility.

The Enduring Popularity of CMSs

Content management systems (CMSs), on the other hand, have been a staple in the web development industry for decades. These platforms provide a comprehensive solution for managing and publishing digital content, ranging from simple websites to complex e-commerce platforms. One of the key advantages of CMSs is the level of customization and control they offer. Unlike low-code platforms, CMSs allow developers to build custom templates and functionality from scratch, giving them the ability to create highly tailored solutions that meet the specific needs of their business. This level of customization can be particularly important for companies that require advanced features, such as complex e-commerce functionality, multi-lingual support, or advanced content personalization. Additionally, CMSs often have a larger and more mature ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and integrations, which can help expand the capabilities of your website or application without the need for extensive custom development. However, the trade-off for this level of customization is often a longer development timeline and a higher upfront cost. CMSs typically require a team of experienced developers to build and maintain, which can be a significant investment for smaller businesses. Another potential downside of CMSs is the learning curve. These platforms often have a more complex user interface and require a deeper understanding of web development principles, which can be a barrier for non-technical users who are looking to manage their own content.

Headless CMSs: A Hybrid Approach

In recent years, a new breed of CMS has emerged, known as "headless" CMSs. These platforms decouple the content management functionality from the front-end presentation layer, allowing developers to build custom, highly-optimized user experiences using their preferred front-end technologies, such as React, Vue.js, or Angular. Headless CMSs offer the best of both worlds, combining the customization and control of a traditional CMS with the flexibility and speed of a low-code platform. By separating the content and the presentation layers, headless CMSs allow developers to focus on building the user experience, while content creators can manage the content independently. This approach can be particularly beneficial for companies that require a high degree of customization and control, but also need to move quickly and adapt to changing market demands. However, headless CMSs also come with their own set of challenges, such as the need for a more technically-skilled development team and the potential for a steeper learning curve for content creators who are used to the visual editing experience of traditional CMSs.

Factors to Consider

When choosing between a low-code platform and a CMS (traditional or headless), there are several key factors to consider:

  1. Technical Expertise: If your team has limited technical skills, a low-code platform may be the more accessible option, as it requires less coding knowledge. However, if you have a skilled development team, a CMS may offer more flexibility and customization options.
  2. Time to Market: Low-code platforms generally offer a faster time to market, as they provide pre-built components and templates that can be quickly assembled. CMSs, on the other hand, may require a longer development timeline, but can result in a more tailored and feature-rich solution.
  3. Customization and Flexibility: As mentioned earlier, CMSs offer a higher degree of customization and control, while low-code platforms may have more limited options. Consider the specific requirements of your business and whether a more customized solution is necessary.
  4. Scalability and Performance: For high-traffic websites or applications with complex functionality, a CMS may be better equipped to handle the demands, as they often have more robust infrastructure and optimization capabilities. Low-code platforms may struggle with scalability and performance for large-scale projects.
  5. Long-term Maintenance and Costs: While low-code platforms may have lower upfront costs, the long-term maintenance and potential for vendor lock-in should be considered. CMSs may have higher initial costs, but can offer more flexibility and control over the long term.
  6. Content Management Experience: If your team is primarily focused on content creation and management, a traditional CMS may provide a more intuitive and user-friendly experience. Low-code platforms may require more technical expertise for content management tasks.


In the end, the choice between a low-code platform and a CMS (traditional or headless) will depend on the specific needs and requirements of your business. Both options have their own unique advantages and disadvantages, and the decision should be made after carefully evaluating your goals, resources, and technical capabilities. If speed and ease of development are your top priorities, a low-code platform may be the way to go. However, if you require a high degree of customization, scalability, and long-term flexibility, a CMS (or a headless CMS) may be the better fit. Ultimately, the decision should be based on a thorough understanding of your business needs and a careful evaluation of the available options. If you need more guidance, schedule a FREE consultation today!

Signup for our newsletter to access more than just blog posts. When you do, you'll get tailored content straight to your inbox!

Related Posts